Difetto Osseo Through-&-Through Su 2.4

[Fabio Bernardello]

Molto bello Giacomo, anche quel roll-flap sutureless mi piace molto.

 

First question: hai creato, sempre a mezzo spessore, una microtasca vestibolare (nel sensi di oltre il limite dell'incisione) per rifletterci dentro la parte di roll disepitelizzata...?

 

Second question: avresti potuto disepitelizzare con la fresa a lembo ancora da sollevare...? (nel senso che era forse più facile)

 

Third question: bello quel bisturino azzuro con cui hai fatto roll...è un oftalmico...? come si chiama...?

[Giancarlo Dal Ponte]

Infatti io non utilizzo la parola "punti": " le ho fatto due piccoli nodini in seta".

[Giacomo Tarquini]

A proposito del caso clinico in oggetto, una piccola anteprima del mio articolo sulla terapia delle atrofie
mascellari mediante innesti in blocco di osso autologo che sarà publicato sul numero 2 della rivista Implantologia, Implantoprotesi e Digitale (Quintessenza Int.)

 

 

 

un saluto

Giacomo Tarquini

 

[Giacomo Tarquini]

Comparative Study

Comparison of Success Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Autogenous Bone Graft Regenerated Areas and Pristine Bone

Nur Altiparmak et al. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Autogenous bone grafting still has been considered as the "gold standard" and wildly used in the case of alveolar bone reconstruction. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the success rate of implants placed in autogenous block augmented ridges and implants placed in pristine bone (PB). This study included 113 patients. Fifty-three patients were treated with autogenous block grafts and particulate bone, after 6 months of healing implant placements were performed in autogenous bone augmented (ABA) areas. In 60 patients implant placement was performed, with no need for grafting and implants were placed into the PB. Follow-up data (pain, mobility, exudation from peri-implant space, success rate, marginal bone resorption) were collected after 5 years of prosthetic loading. The cumulative implant success rate at the 5-year examination was 92.45% for the ABA group and 85% for PB group. There were 3 failed implants in the ABA group and 3 in PB group. Average marginal bone loss was 1.47 mm on ABA group and 1.58 mm on PB group. No statistically significant differences for pain, exudation from peri-implant space, implant mobility, implant success, peri-implant bone loss parameters, and patient satisfaction level were found between groups. The obtained data demonstrated that the success rate of implants placed in regenerated areas are very similar to the success rate of implants those placed in PB.

Modificato Agosto 12, 2023 da Giacomo Tarquini